1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2007 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2007 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Jeep Cherokee (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 510 kg more than 1969 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2007 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Jaguar 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2007 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2007 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
Model | 240 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1969 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 78 L |