1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Jaguar 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Jaguar 240 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Jaguar | Jeep |
| Model | 240 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2483 cc | 3979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 172 HP |
| Torque | 198 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 99 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 14.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |
