1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 6 (212 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 260 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 6 (267 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | 240 | 6 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 267 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |