1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2011 Citroen Berlingo
To start off, 2011 Citroen Berlingo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2011 Citroen Berlingo. (74 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2011 Citroen Berlingo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Citroen Berlingo weights approximately 42 kg more than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Citroen Berlingo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Jaguar 240 (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Citroen Berlingo. (185 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1969 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Citroen Berlingo.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2011 Citroen Berlingo | |
Make | Jaguar | Citroen |
Model | 240 | Berlingo |
Year Released | 1969 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 18.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1482 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |