1969 Jaguar 240 vs. 2012 BMW M3
To start off, 2012 BMW M3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW M3 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1969 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW M3 (400 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2012 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar 240 | 2012 BMW M3 | |
Make | Jaguar | BMW |
Model | 240 | M3 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 3999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 414 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 8300 RPM |
Torque | 198 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 75.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1440 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4615 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1803 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1424 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2761 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.2 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 63 L |