1969 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (301 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 260 kg more than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Jaguar E-Type | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | E-Type | CLK |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |
