1969 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2003 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2003 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Jaguar E-Type | 2003 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | E-Type | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |
