1969 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 340 kg more than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar E-Type | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Jaguar | Jaguar |
Model | E-Type | XJ |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 85 L |