1969 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2007 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2007 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar E-Type (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 2007 Volkswagen Polo. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 2007 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 315 kg more than 2007 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Jaguar E-Type 2007 Volkswagen Polo
Make Jaguar Volkswagen
Model E-Type Polo
Year Released 1969 2007
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4235 cc 1197 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 225 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 5400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1085 kg
Vehicle Length 4460 mm 3920 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1190 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2450 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 45 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]