1969 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar E-Type. (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar E-Type.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Jaguar E-Type | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | E-Type | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 3727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 76 L |
