1969 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar E-Type (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2010 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 2010 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 100 kg more than 2010 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jaguar E-Type | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
Model | E-Type | Matrix |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 50 L |