1969 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar E-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar E-Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Jaguar E-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jaguar E-Type (225 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2013 Honda Fit. (115 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jaguar E-Type should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jaguar E-Type weights approximately 255 kg more than 2013 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Jaguar E-Type | 2013 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Jaguar | Honda |
| Model | E-Type | Fit |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4235 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4105 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1190 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 40 L |
