1969 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1969 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Jeep CJ5 (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 530 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1969 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Jeep CJ5 | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | CJ5 | Fronte |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 32 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2060 mm |