1969 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2001 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2001 Subaru Outback is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Subaru Outback (282 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2001 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jeep CJ5. 2001 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 1969 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1969 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Jeep CJ5 | 2001 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Jeep | Subaru |
| Model | CJ5 | Outback |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2001 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 282 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2530 mm |
