1969 Lancia Flaminia vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2004 Mercury Sable is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lancia Flaminia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lancia Flaminia would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1969 Lancia Flaminia. (138 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1969 Lancia Flaminia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Lancia Flaminia weights approximately 7 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lancia Flaminia. (221 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lancia Flaminia.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Lancia Flaminia | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Lancia | Mercury |
Model | Flaminia | Sable |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2773 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 68 L |