1969 Lincoln Continental vs. 2009 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,544 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lincoln Continental (365 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Rogue. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 878 kg more than 2009 Nissan Rogue. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Lincoln Continental (678 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 441 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1969 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Lincoln Continental | 2009 Nissan Rogue | |
Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
Model | Continental | Rogue |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7544 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 365 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 678 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 110.9 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 97.8 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2207 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5490 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2700 mm |