1969 Lotus Elan vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1969 Lotus Elan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 431 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 146 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Lotus Elan | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Lotus | Nissan |
Model | Elan | Cedric |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 889 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |