1969 Lotus Elan vs. 1967 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1969 Lotus Elan is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 2,597 cc, 1967 Toyota Crown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (116 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1967 Toyota Crown. (98 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1967 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Toyota Crown weights approximately 525 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Toyota Crown (200 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Lotus Elan | 1967 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Lotus | Toyota |
Model | Elan | Crown |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2597 cc |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |