1969 Lotus Elan vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 1980 Mazda 929 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 929 weights approximately 181 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Lotus Elan (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Lotus Elan | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Lotus | Mazda |
Model | Elan | 929 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 88 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 889 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |