1969 Lotus Elan vs. 1981 Renault Siete
To start off, 1981 Renault Siete is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (118 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1981 Renault Siete. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1981 Renault Siete. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Lotus Elan weights approximately 74 kg more than 1981 Renault Siete. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Renault Siete, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Lotus Elan (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Renault Siete. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1969 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Renault Siete.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Lotus Elan | 1981 Renault Siete | |
Make | Lotus | Renault |
Model | Elan | Siete |
Year Released | 1969 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 146 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 889 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2540 mm |