1969 Lotus Elan vs. 1989 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1989 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 286 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Because 1969 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Lotus Elan | 1989 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Lotus | Plymouth |
| Model | Elan | Sundance |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 889 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2470 mm |
