1969 Lotus Elan vs. 2002 Volvo C70

To start off, 2002 Volvo C70 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,984 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo C70 (162 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1969 Lotus Elan. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1969 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo C70 weights approximately 511 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo C70 (230 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Lotus Elan 2002 Volvo C70
Make Lotus Volvo
Model Elan C70
Year Released 1969 2002
Body Type Convertible Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1558 cc 1984 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 162 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 146 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.6 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72.8 mm 77 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 889 kg 1400 kg
Vehicle Length 4300 mm 4730 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1200 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]