1969 Lotus Elan vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 4,669 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1969 Lotus Elan. (116 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1969 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Tundra (441 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Lotus Elan | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Lotus | Toyota |
| Model | Elan | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 4669 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 146 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 2170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |
