1969 Lotus Elan vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (116 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 416 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Because 1969 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Lotus Elan (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C3. (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1969 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Lotus Elan | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Lotus | Citroen |
Model | Elan | C3 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 78.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |