1969 Lotus Elan vs. 2012 Fiat Linea
To start off, 2012 Fiat Linea is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (118 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2012 Fiat Linea. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 2012 Fiat Linea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Linea weights approximately 296 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Because 1969 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Linea, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Linea (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Fiat Linea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Lotus Elan | 2012 Fiat Linea | |
Make | Lotus | Fiat |
Model | Elan | Linea |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 69.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 82.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 17.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 889 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 45 L |