1969 Mazda 1000 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (94 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1969 Mazda 1000. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda 1000.
Because 1969 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mazda 1000 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 1000 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 987 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2490 mm |