1969 Mazda 110 S vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1969 Mazda 110 S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda 110 S (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (97 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda 110 S should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 64 kg more than 1969 Mazda 110 S.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Mazda 110 S (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1969 Mazda 110 S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Mazda 110 S | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 110 S | Clio |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1390 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2690 mm |
