1969 Mazda 110 S vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda 110 S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda 110 S would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1969 Mazda 110 S. (108 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda 110 S.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (310 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda 110 S. (142 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda 110 S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Mazda 110 S | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
| Model | 110 S | XJ |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 4200 cc |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 297 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3040 mm |
