1969 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith
To start off, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith would be higher. At 4,255 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith (123 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mazda Cosmo | 1954 Rolls-Royce Silver Wraith | |
Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Cosmo | Silver Wraith |
Year Released | 1969 | 1954 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 4255 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 81 L |