1969 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1970 Mini Clubman
To start off, 1970 Mini Clubman is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 290 kg more than 1970 Mini Clubman.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mazda Cosmo | 1970 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | Cosmo | Clubman |
Year Released | 1969 | 1970 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2140 mm |