1969 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1973 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1973 Triumph Spitfire is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 160 kg more than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph Spitfire. (93 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mazda Cosmo | 1973 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | Cosmo | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1969 | 1973 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2110 mm |