1969 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1981 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1981 Opel Ascona is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1981 Opel Ascona. (81 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1981 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Opel Ascona weights approximately 74 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Opel Ascona (134 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1981 Opel Ascona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mazda Cosmo | 1981 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | Cosmo | Ascona |
Year Released | 1969 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1014 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2580 mm |