1969 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2003 Proton Juara
To start off, 2003 Proton Juara is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 Proton Juara. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton Juara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Proton Juara weights approximately 65 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Proton Juara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton Juara. (94 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1969 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton Juara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Mazda Cosmo | 2003 Proton Juara | |
| Make | Mazda | Proton |
| Model | Cosmo | Juara |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1962 cc | 1094 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1005 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2400 mm |
