1969 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura CSX weights approximately 373 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mazda Cosmo | 2009 Acura CSX | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | Cosmo | CSX |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1962 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |