1969 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Mazda Cosmo | 2009 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Cosmo | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1962 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 143 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 59 L |
