1969 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 178 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 467 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Mazda Cosmo | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
| Model | Cosmo | XF |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1962 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2908 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |
