1969 Mazda Familia vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Familia. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Familia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 790 kg more than 1969 Mazda Familia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda Familia. (79 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda Familia.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mazda Familia | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | Familia | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 987 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |