1969 Mazda Luce vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Mazda Luce is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,618 cc, 1969 Mazda Luce is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda Luce (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda Luce should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Mazda Luce weights approximately 85 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Mazda Luce (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Mazda Luce will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mazda Luce | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | Luce | 2000 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2618 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2700 mm |