1969 MG 1100 vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1969 MG 1100 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1969 MG 1100. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 1969 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 660 kg more than 1969 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 MG 1100 | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
| Make | MG | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | 1100 | 6C |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1938 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2442 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3010 mm |
