1969 MG 1100 vs. 2002 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2002 Smart ForFour is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 MG 1100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Smart ForFour (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1969 MG 1100. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1969 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Smart ForFour weights approximately 126 kg more than 1969 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 MG 1100 (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Smart ForFour. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1969 MG 1100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1969 MG 1100 | 2002 Smart ForFour | |
Make | MG | Smart |
Model | 1100 | ForFour |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2510 mm |