1969 MG 1100 vs. 2003 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2003 MG ZT-T is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT-T (187 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1969 MG 1100. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 1969 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT-T weights approximately 785 kg more than 1969 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT-T (250 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 MG 1100. (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 MG 1100 | 2003 MG ZT-T | |
| Make | MG | MG |
| Model | 1100 | ZT-T |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 2495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 104 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2750 mm |
