1969 MG 1100 vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1969 MG 1100. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1969 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 460 kg more than 1969 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Matrix (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 MG 1100. (104 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1969 MG 1100 | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | 1100 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 104 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2601 mm |