1969 Mini MK III vs. 2005 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Musso is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mini MK III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mini MK III would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Musso (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1969 Mini MK III. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso should accelerate faster than 1969 Mini MK III.
Because 2005 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Mini MK III. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Musso (245 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mini MK III. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Musso will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mini MK III.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mini MK III | 2005 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Mini | SsangYong |
Model | MK III | Musso |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 2874 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |