1969 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1969 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 120 kg more than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Colt | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2690 mm |