1969 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 188 more horse power than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (415 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Mitsubishi Colt | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Colt | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4671 cc |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 120 Nm | 415 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 2010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2800 mm |
