1969 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 184 more horse power than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Mitsubishi Colt | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | Colt | 75 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 4601 cc |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1415 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2750 mm |