1969 Monteverdi 375 vs. 2010 Dodge Caliber

To start off, 2010 Dodge Caliber is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Monteverdi 375. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Monteverdi 375 would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Monteverdi 375 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Monteverdi 375 (340 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2010 Dodge Caliber. (172 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Monteverdi 375 should accelerate faster than 2010 Dodge Caliber.

Let's talk about torque, 1969 Monteverdi 375 (584 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Caliber. (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1969 Monteverdi 375 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Caliber.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Monteverdi 375 2010 Dodge Caliber
Make Monteverdi Dodge
Model 375 Caliber
Year Released 1969 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7206 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 340 HP 172 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 584 Nm 223 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4630 mm 4415 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1748 mm
Vehicle Height 1240 mm 1534 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2634 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 130 L 51 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]