1969 Monteverdi 400 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Monteverdi 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Monteverdi 400 would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Monteverdi 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Monteverdi 400 weights approximately 124 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 1969 Monteverdi 400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Monteverdi 400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Monteverdi 400 (657 Nm) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volvo C30. (350 Nm). This means 1969 Monteverdi 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Monteverdi 400 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Monteverdi | Volvo |
| Model | 400 | C30 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7206 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 392 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 657 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1240 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 130 L | 60 L |
