1969 Nissan Cedric vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (248 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 510 kg more than 1969 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Nissan Cedric | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cedric | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1969 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 7462 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 248 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 502 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2850 mm |