1969 Nissan Cedric vs. 1975 Volvo 260
To start off, 1975 Volvo 260 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1969 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 260 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1969 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 Volvo 260 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1975 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Nissan Cedric | 1975 Volvo 260 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Cedric | 260 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 146 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
